Microbiological Impact of Chlorhexidine on Oral Biofilm Communities: Bacterial Ecology, Biofilm Disruption, and Antimicrobial Dynamics

Authors

  • Abdulrahman Zaid Al-Najjar Department of Dental Basic Science, College of Dentistry, Gilgamesh University, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Saif Abdulelah Mustafa Al Najar Department of Microbiology, Al Shirqat General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Salah Al-Deen, Iraq.
  • Iman Ali Khalil Al-Obaidi Oral Diagnosis Department, Ashur University, College of Dentistry, Ashur University, Iraq.
  • Hussein R. Khaled Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gilgamesh University, Baghdad. Iraq.
  • Manar Emad Ahmed College of Dentistry, Gilgamesh University, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Tamarah Mazin Mohammed Ameen Department of Dental Basic Seience, Dentistry Department, Al-Qabas Private College, Mosul, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v12i4.2229

Keywords:

Chlorhexidine, Oral microbiology, Biofilm, Oral microbiome, Antimicrobial activity, Dental plaque

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the microbiological effects of chlorhexidine on multispecies oral biofilm communities, specifically bacterial ecology, biofilm disruption, and antimicrobial dynamics
Methods: A multispecies biofilm model was created in vitro under clinically relevant conditions through the use of oral bacterial strains. Biofilms were exposed to chlorhexidine (0.02%, 0.06%, and 0.12%). Colony-forming unit (CFU) counting was used to determine the viability of bacteria, and crystal violet stain was used to quantify the biomass of biofilm. Conventional microbiological identification techniques were used to assess microbial composition. One-way ANOVA with the use of Tukey post hoc test was conducted.
Results: Chlorhexidine exhibited a strong concentration-related antimicrobial action on oral biofilm made of many species. Bacteria viability as well as biofilm biomass were significantly reduced in all treatment categories (p < 0.05). Microbial viability declined by a maximum of 85.5% at the highest concentration (0.12%) and the biofilm biomass declined by 78% which suggests that biofilm integrity was significantly disturbed. Also, it was found that not all bacterial species were equally susceptible with Gram-positive species being more susceptible to it than Gram-negative anaerobes. Nevertheless, this was followed by residual presence of bacteria in the biofilm matrix which implied protective mechanisms that reduce total elimination of antimicrobials.
Conclusion: Chlorhexidine has many effects on oral biofilm structure and bacterial viability that go beyond antimicrobial activity to other effects of inhibition of microbial ecology and selective pressure in biofilm communities. These results demonstrate that biofilm-level mechanisms need to be taken into account when considering the use of antiseptics in clinical dentistry.

References

Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(9):563-575.

Marsh PD, Zaura E. Dental biofilm: ecological interactions in health and disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(Suppl 18):S12-S22.

Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS. Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(7):471-480.

Marsh PD. In sickness and in health—what does the oral microbiome mean to us? J Dent Res. 2018;97(4):389-394.

Serrano J, Escribano M, Roldán S, Martín C, Herrera D. Efficacy of adjunctive anti-plaque chemical agents in managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(Suppl 16):S106-S138.

Cieplik F, Jakubovics NS, Buchalla W, Maisch T, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A. Resistance toward chlorhexidine in oral bacteria—is there cause for concern? Front Microbiol. 2019;10:587. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587.

Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997;15:55-62.

Van Strydonck DA, Slot DE, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden F. Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque and gingival inflammation. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(11):1042-1055.

Kampf G. Acquired resistance to chlorhexidine—is it time to establish an antiseptic stewardship initiative? J Hosp Infect. 2018;94(3):213-227.

Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P. Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(12):740-755.

Lamont RJ, Koo H, Hajishengallis G. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(12):745-759.

Karygianni L, Ren Z, Koo H, Thurnheer T. Biofilm matrixome: extracellular components in structured microbial communities. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(8):668-681.

Rosier BT, Marsh PD, Mira A. Resilience of the oral microbiota in health: mechanisms that prevent dysbiosis. J Dent Res. 2018;97(4):371-380.

Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ. Polymicrobial communities in periodontal disease: their quasi-organismal nature and dialogue with the host. Periodontol 2000. 2021;86(1):210-230.

Curtis MA, Diaz PI, Van Dyke TE. The role of the microbiota in periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83(1):14-25.

Marsh PD. In sickness and in health—what does the oral microbiome mean to us? An ecological perspective. J Dent Res. 2018;97(4):372-380.

Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ. Polymicrobial communities in periodontal disease: their quasi-organismal nature and dialogue with the host. Periodontol 2000. 2021;86(1):210-230. doi:10.1111/prd.12371.

Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ, Koo H. Oral polymicrobial communities: assembly, function, and impact on diseases. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(4):528-538.

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Zaid Al-Najjar, A., Abdulelah Mustafa Al Najar, S., Ali Khalil Al-Obaidi, I., R. Khaled, H., Emad Ahmed, M., & Mazin Mohammed Ameen, T. (2026). Microbiological Impact of Chlorhexidine on Oral Biofilm Communities: Bacterial Ecology, Biofilm Disruption, and Antimicrobial Dynamics. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v12i4.2229