Developing an innovative clinical governance assessment framework for Dental Schools in Iran

  • D Dehghanian Community Oral Health Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • P Heydarpoor School of Management and Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • M Namdari Community Oral Health Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • MH Khoshnevisan Preventive Dentistry Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a DCG assessment framework for use in local dental schools in Iran.
Methods: A mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) was used in the present investigation. The study was performed in 3 steps, including: a) thorough literature review, b) focused group discussion and c) Application of validated instrument. The content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated for each question. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability for this questionnaire. The Smart PLS software was used for calculation of Goodness of Fit (GOF) for confirmatory factorial analysis to determine construct validity of this questionnaire.
Results: Initially, 140 items covering 7 DCG domains were identified after comprehensive literature review. Ten specialists participated in the expert panel, rating independently on the necessity, relevancy, simplicity and clarity of each question. Expert’s ratings were used to calculate the validity for each question. The questions with CVI lower than 0.79 and the CVR less than 0.62 were excluded. Reliability analysis was conducted by calculating intra class coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha coefficient which were 0.88 and 0.92 respectively. This shows good reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire. Construct validity determined by computing Goodness of Fit index. The result was 0.622, which indicates a good level of construct validity. After validation process, 124 out of 140 questions left to cover the 7 domains of DCG in our newly developed and validated framework.
Conclusions: The newly developed and standardized DCG framework can be used for assessment of compliance level among Iranian dental schools at the national level.
share this Article by

References

1- Mills I, Batchelor P. Quality indicators: the rationale behind their use in NHS dentistry. Br Dent J 2011; 312:11-15

2- Ball G. Clinical Governance in Dental Primary Care .National Dental Advisory Committee. 2001; 1-2

3- Yamalik N. Quality systems in dentistry Part 2.Quality Assurance and Improvement (QA/I) tools that have implications for dentistry. Int. Dent J 2007; 57:459-67.

4- Maidment YG. Clinical Governance. What is it and how can it be delivered in Dental Practices? Prim Dent Care. 2004 Apr; 11(2):57-61.

5- Rob Mc, Paddy P. Clinical governance and National Health Service. JohnT, editor. Clinical governance a guide to implementation for Health care professionals, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Willey-Blackwell; 2011. p.2.

6- Hugh B, Anup K. A model dental governance framework for General Dental Services provided by the Local health boards 2013; 1-69.

7- Valenza JA, George LA, O'Neill PN. A model for clinical credentialing of dental school faculty. J Dent Educ. 2005; 69: 870-8.

8-Holden LC, Moore RS. The development of a model and implementation process for clinical governance in primary dental care.Br Dent J 2004; 196: 21-4.

9- Kenya medical practitioners and dentists boards national training and quality assurance standards for dental schools and teaching hospitals in Kenya September 2015; 1-63
10- Fredekind RE, Cuny EJ, Nadershahi NA.Quality assurance and risk management: a survey of dental schools and recommendations for integrated program management. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66:556-63.
11- Kakudate N, Yokoyama Y, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gordan VV, Gilbert GH, Use of clinical practice guidelines by dentists: findings from the Japanese dental practice-based research network. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1):96-101.
12-Tobias O.Nyumba, Kerrie Wilson, Christina J. Derrick, Nibedita Mukherjee. The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution.2018; 21-32.
13- Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975; 28: 563–575.
14- Cronbach LJ.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16:297–334.
15- Poul E, Denis B, Hiroshi Ogawa, SaskiaE, Charlotte N. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005; 83: 661-669
16- Khoshnevisan M.H, Ghasemianpour M, Samadzadeh H, Baez RJ. Oral health status and healthcare system in I.R. Iran. J Contemp.Med Sci 2018; 4: 107–118
Published
2019-12-31
How to Cite
DEHGHANIAN, D et al. Developing an innovative clinical governance assessment framework for Dental Schools in Iran. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 6, dec. 2019. ISSN 2413-0516. Available at: <http://www.jocms.org/index.php/jcms/article/view/680>. Date accessed: 21 feb. 2020.