Surgical early complications of the laparoscopic insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter: A cross-sectional descriptive two-center study in Ahvaz, southwest of Iran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v7i6.1076Keywords:
Peritoneal dialysis, early complications, Infectious complications, Mechanical complications.Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the surgical complications of this technique of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion in Imam Khomeini and Golestan hospitals in Ahvaz, southwest of Iran, in the period between 2007 and 2019.
Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional analytic-descriptive study, we examined end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion between 2007 and 2019. Patients' records and follow-up information recorded in the hospital dialysis unit were reviewed and early infectious and mechanical complications of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion were analyzed.
Results: In this study, 290 patients (144 males and 138 females) with ESRD who have a mean age of 46±19.7 years (1-90 years) were recruited, of whom 8 patients were excluded due to incomplete information in their records, and 68 patients (24.1%) had an early complication of surgery. Surgical complications included: Catheter exit-site infections in 20 patients (7.1%), peritonitis in 18 patients (6.4%), catheter exit-site leakage in 17 patients (6%), catheter occlusion without migration in 16 patients (5.7%), catheter migration in 7 patients (2.5%), and hemoperitoneum in 7 patients (2.5%).
Conclusions: Due to the low complications of laparoscopic surgery in the insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter, this technique is recommended as a safe surgical procedure with low complications.
References
2. Ashegh H, Rezaii J, Esfandiari K, Roueentan A, Abouzari M. Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters in CAPD patients: complications and survival. Tehran University Medical Journal TUMS Publications. 2008;66(3):186-90.
3. Jwo SC, Chen KS, Lee CC, Chen HY. Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter--a single center experience and literature review. J Surg Res. 2010;159(1):489-96.
4. Prabhakar N, Aljamal YN, Saleem HY, Baloul MS, Nyberg SL, Farley DR. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open CAPD catheter placement: A single-center experience. Surgery Open Science. 2019;1(1):20-4.
5. GarcÃa-Cruz E, Vera-Rivera M, Molina JC, Mallafré-Sala J, Alcaraz A. Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter: description and results of a two-port. Official Publication of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. 2010;30(3):354-9.
6. Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Glantzounis G, Toli C, Sferopoulos G, Pappas M, et al. Laparoscopic placement of the Tenckhoff catheter for peritoneal dialysis. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2000;10(4):218-21.
7. Manouras AJ, Kekis PB, Stamou KM, Konstadoulakis MM, Apostolidis NS. Laparoscopic placement of Oreopoulos–Zellerman catheters in CAPD patients. Peritoneal dialysis international. 2004;24(3):252-5.
8. Chen Y, Shao Y, Xu J. The Survival and Complication Rates of Laparoscopic Versus Open Catheter Placement in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(5):440-3.
9. Li J-R, Chen C-H, Cheng C-L, Yang C-K, Ou Y-C, Ho H-C, et al. Five-year experience of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2012;75(7):309-13.
10. van Laanen JHH, Cornelis T, Mees BM, Litjens EJ, van Loon MM, Tordoir JHM, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Placement of a Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter and Outcomes: The CAPD I Trial. Perit Dial Int. 2018;38(2):104-12.
11. Bircan HY, Kulah E. Effects of a Novel Peritoneal Dialysis: The Open Versus Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Tunneling Technique. Ther Apher Dial. 2016;20(1):66-72.
12. Shrestha BM, Shrestha D, Kumar A, Shrestha A, Boyes SA, Wilkie ME. Advanced Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Perit Dial Int. 2018;38(3):163-71.
13. Keshvari A, Lesan Pezeshki M, Younesian M. Mechanical and infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis catheters in surgical wards of Imam Khomeini Hospital: 7 Year Experience. Tehran University Medical Journal TUMS Publications. 2006;64(6):95-102.
14. Shahbandari M, Amiran A. Comparison of the complications of open surgery versus laparoscopic technique in insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter. J Res Med Sci. 2019;24:85.
15. Shyr Y, Su C, Lui W. Complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: one surgeon's experience with 668 patient-month follow-up. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi= Chinese medical journal; Free China ed. 1995;55(4):307-14.
16. Gadallah MF, Arora N, Arumugam R, Moles K. Role of Fogarty catheter manipulation in management of migrated, nonfunctional peritoneal dialysis catheters. American journal of kidney diseases. 2000;35(2):301-5.
17. Özener Ç, Bihorac A, Akoglu E. Technical survival of CAPD catheters: comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2001;16(9):1893-9.
18. Qiao Q, Lu G, Xu D, Zhou X, Li L. A comparison of two methods for catheterization in peritoneal dialysis. Jiangsu Med J. 2012;38(23):2812-4.
19. Öğünç G, Tuncer M, Öğünç D, Yardimsever M, Ersoy F. Laparoscopic omental fixation technique versus open surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques. 2003;17(11):1749-55.
20. Xie P, Yuan L, Liu F. The comparison of efficacy and safety between laparoscopic and conventional placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Hebei Med. 2014;4:562-6.
